Cancer, Fraud, and Bad Biotech!  Edward A. Greenhalgh - 75 York St., Suite 1603, Kitchener ON, N2G 1T5, (519) 579-8320 | E-mail: info@cancerfraudbadbiotech.com May & July 2008 Revision JULY 2008: AS of 2008 there have been a series of “exciting” cancer discoveries announced in the media. Not to take away from the different groups’ hard work, but much of what they have “discovered” dates back to my 1988 Cell Death Signal Theory research sent out as proposals and descriptions to the Canadian and US governments, pharmaceutical firms and research centers in Canada, US, and the UK. These centers have included Princess Margaret Cancer Center (UT, Canada) U of Louisville (USA), Princess Patricia Hospital (Southampton, UK), and the Max Planck Research Institute, among many: even though I was black listed I wanted to help society, and the best way was to put these ideas in front of as many people as possible to speed the research. You cannot just show up at conferences, first they don’t let you in, and then they slander you and block you speaking anyways. So the only choice was to send out the theories so they would get around that way (and so be documented). What the public is asked to understand is that the documented evidence of the research THEORIES dating DIRECTLY back to the suppressed work of 1988. Research blacklisted and suppressed so academic and felony fraud could be committed (and people could die that might have been helped). So, ask yourselves, if the present day researchers are calling these “rediscovered” “NEW” theories of major importance, wouldn’t better treatments be available NOW!! POINT; MENDEL PRESENTED HIS GENE THEORIES ABOUT 60 YEARS BEFORE THEY WERE “REDISCOVERED”. Researchers of his day just weren’t ready for new ideas; they were bad and selfish who really wanted to promote themselves. I have been black listed and hurt for 20 years now, but the theories haven’t stopped Cell Death Signal Theory has grown into the Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of Life (VTT). I NEED THE PUBLIC’S HELP NOW!! How many more people have to suffer so a lie can be covered up? The new theories involve pollution, GMOs, global warming and the creation of new diseases. You think you will die from flooding? More likely from a new disease for which you have no immune defenses. And the documented evidence proves my past theories to right and important. Will you help? 2008 Wake Forest University (USA) reports on immune cells taken from healthy mice and placed in mice with cancer find that the tumours are attacked and the mice are cured of cancer. The granulocytes attack the tumours causing them to disappear. The BBC news read, “Clone cell cancer “cure” hailed.” The article read that a 52 yr old man with melanoma was cancer free after 2 years. US researchers (New England Journal of Medicine) took cancer fighting immune cells and made billions of copies and put them back in the patient. The patient is alive and cancer free after 2 years. I ask the reader to realize that this theory was explained to the US government over 20 years ago in my correspondence concerned about the academic fraud being committed by Yale and Waterloo universities. Letters to the Public Health Service (PHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plus the Dept. of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI. To name a few. [see Green section for some of the legal correspondence]. Long story short, why wasn’t this research helped by the very public bodies that are MANDATED by Acts under Congress to promote medical research of benefit to the taxpayer? Why did they CHOOSE to help cover up fraud, thus blocking beneficial cancer research? You should ask them!!! How many people have died over the last 20 years that didn’t have to? Do you know anyone who died of cancer? PLEASE NOTE a cancer EXPERT at Imperial College in London (UK) described the BBC article research as “pretty exciting” with “potentially wide application.” PLEASE NOTE: I sent research proposals to Imperial College in the early nineties. If you are from the UK you should ask your government why they went along with the black listing to cover up academic/felony fraud? Do you know anyone in England? Scotland? Wales? Ireland? Who died of cancer? Maybe they didn’t have to. You can still help now. Please note that in 2007 researchers at Max Planck Research Institute published a paper discussing Cell Death Signal theory (go to the internet and look it up), and then go to the Green section of the website and see my letters to the Canadian government and Ministry of Health circa 1988. Please note that as of July 2008 a Massachusetts University has produced a study of a silicon chip which captures tumour cells and can detect cancers earlier so better treatment options are available. IN THE NEXT THREE YEARS they HOPE TO BRING IT TO THE PUBLIC. That will be 2011. Wouldn’t ten years ago have been better? Please note under Goldman Philanthropic Funding/Culpepper project I discuss research proposals and there is a mention of research being done at a Mass. University. See at the end of Red Section with Merck. Pfizer and Hughes foundation proposals. What all the above researchers are missing is that they don’t tell you what cancer really is and if they knew that then cancer could be treated better, which is why I still need everyone’s’ help. Cell Death Signal Theory became VTT after reviewing the work of everyone and finding that Conrat-Frankel had said that viruses were the origin of life in 1963. He was hated then but later won the Nobel prize. Examing genes and the rest of my work you can see that genes are basically viroids that have come together in an economical solution to maintaining themselves, and condensing even more complexity, life is simply a solution to store more energy. Life is a never ending replicating chemical reaction. Viruses therefore are the origin of ALL cells and all cell components. These include all cell receptors and hormones. Evolution of virus components has lead to receptors and hormones and the functioning of cells and eventually higher organisms. Hence immune cells are a viroid derived control system. They are programmed by viroid components . In a healthy undamaged cell/tissue everything is in sync and harmony. Cancer disease occurs in response to some type of damage: radiation, chemical etc. that effects the harmony causing out of sync messages to occur or even the gene to come out of the genome to be a virus. This is too complicated for the insert I am preparing here. Longer story short, the virus REPROGRAMS the immune cells not to recognize viruses or tumours as dangerous. In the above “new discoveries” the immune cells from healthy animals simply have not been reprogrammed and see the tumour tissue as dangerous and to be removed. Can you understand the concept? I think most people can. Another consequence of this is that the tumour signals, the evolved viral hormones will be found in any individual long before a tumour forms. Therefore, if you develop systems to look for these peptides, Ring complexes, whole gamut of hormone types but specific for tumours you can detect cancer long before it is deadly!!! Now ask yourselves why no one has helped me? Why has everyone chosen to cover up academic lying, misconduct and fraud? Will you help the research? The research has ramifications to developing new vaccines and dealing with AIDS. See the Merck, Pfizer and Gates Foundation proposals at the end of the Red Section. But more importantly, VTT is concerned about pollution GMOs and new diseases. Diseases are not parasites but evolutionary REGULATORS. The media has said that the polar ice cap will be gone this year and the Artic ocean will have open water for the first time in mankind’s’ memory. This is absolutely frightening. And we are dumping so much sewage in our waters as to be even more scary. And we have free radicals from pollution and GMO genes running wild, literally. Earth is a living organism, and I just explained that viruses are the REGULATORS OF LIFE. Mankind, as a species is out of control, what do you think is the best way to regulate an out of control species? If you examine models in nature you will see diseases occur to do that. And what we now face, especially because of GMOs, are gene sequences in the wrong places!! And whose genes are these? Mankinds!! See the Red or Gold section where this is discussed but we must clean up the earth or we will die. Extinction. Extinction of species has happened before, usually due to environmental stress, and the present environmental stress is species specific. We may only have 20 years to act. Oil crisis and global warming is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg, new mankind-programmed diseases will be the ultimate threat. Will you help? This is just a condensed addition to the website. I will now finish the letter to PM Harper, and include material to Governor Arnold Scwharznegger of California (since The “Guvenator” is concerned about the environment and promoting Biotech and my concerns are about BAD biotech. Also Canada and California has entered into a 100 million dollar biotech program collaboration.). Thank you. I look forward to any response the public may make. E.A.Greenhalgh MAY 2008:The QUESTION remains unanswered; Is lying for money fraud? And can research described in derogatory terms by official federal documents be called excellent? And if the government will accept lies and cover up how safe is the public and any subsequent research that the government declares safe because it is excellent? Can the public afford to bet their lives on allowing the government to lie so friends can use government programs to make money by labeling substandard products as excellent (i.e., vaccines, medicines, treatments, etc.)? The present update is made only to affirm the website is alive and your help is still needed. I am a cancer survivor, but the blacklisting and associated financial hardship makes life extremely difficult, exactly what the malicious mean-spirited people who blacklist intend. So changes often are delayed. The most basic request I can make of you is to have patience and tell as many people as you can about this site because you can help to change history and the world. Think about this, maybe if my research wasn’t suppressed to cover up fraud by the Universities of Waterloo and Yale, then Senator Ted Kennedy, or the brother of David Cook the new American Idol would not have to die from their brain cancer (please note my theory involved non invasive treatment to tell the tumours to die. Genetic programming signals). So many women say they walk for breast cancer and a cure, but if you look at the old section of the website you will see proposals going back to the early nineties to the drug companies and numerous universities that could have solved the problem by now. BUT no one helped! DO YOU REALLY CARE? If you do then you will help, it is that simple. FACT: I had cancer and used my theories and lived! My supervisor, who contaminated the lab (a bad scientist and mentor) with a cancer causing isotope had conventional treatment and DIED!!! New theories vs. old: I lived! Do you want to? Do you want to protect your loved ones? If you do then you will help. The previous 2007 Purple Section will be finished and included in the final Blue Section when the courier letter to Prime Minister Stephan Harper is complete and sent. It is entitled, “IS THE PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE (PMO) COMPLICIT IN A CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE?”A very serious letter connecting the University of Waterloo and RIM (Research in Motion, the Blackberry) past and present through President David Johnston, President Emeritus Douglas Wright and Chancellor Michael Laziridis to continuous lobbying of the federal government to cover up criminal activity at the taxpayers’ expense and the public good. Government should not be a partner in crime but must act to protect the public and must act to expose wrong doing, not cover it up. Karl Heinz Schreiber has his Brian Mulroney letter, but so do I, but mine proves that the former P.M. Brian Mulroney was aware of the criminality of the Administration of the University of Waterloo. And since this has arisen new evidence of other secret or held back papers/information by the government has come to my attention making a Public Inquiry of the Center of Excellence Program an important public health and safety issue. If you are an American or European/UK resident you may not appreciate how the Center of Excellence program affects you but there are similar programs running in the US and in the UK (another form) too. The Center of Excellence program is a danger because it takes away the independence of universities and makes researchers and students simply extended employees of private companies and as such can’t act in the public’s best interests to warn of dangerous drugs or practices. They can lose their careers and futures to blacklisting or even sued. In short universities aren’t centers of learning but drug development and technical training centers where employees (students and professors) are bound not by ethics and duty to mankind’s advancement but company policy even if it violates federal regulations and laws even though they are funded more by the taxpayer than private enterprise. A code of silence and corruption. That is unless you act to help expose this. How are you in danger and why was I black listed? Remember circa 1980 and the Tainted Blood Scandal where contaminated blood from American prisons was channeled through Canada and shipped all around the world infecting thousands of people with Hep C.There was a test for this that they didn’t use because of cost and they didn’t want the private company held liable so profit was put ahead of public safety. Fact: no one has gone to jail for this but the taxpayer was on the hook for the liability (not the private company). Wouldn’t you call the action criminal negligence causing harm? You think anyone learnt a lesson? You think wrong because people in the FDA and Health Canada are laughing at you. What about Mad cow? What about WMDs? What about the super tuberculosis bug that escaped from the FDA lab last year to fly around the world undetected among the public? What about the hoof and mouth outbreak in the UK from a so-called secure lab; how many farmers were hurt? Has anyone been held accountable ? When does it stop? How about the women in Newfoundland who died when their breast cancer tests were wrongly diagnosed? And what about Hemasol blood products that both the FDA and Health Canada allowed to continue testing even though secret documents (like I am seeking) told how people were endangered from clotting and heart attacks, this was just now exposed in 2008. But if you don’t care, then who does? That is why they can afford to laugh at you because you don’t do anything to hold them accountable. Note the link the between myself (E.A.Greenhalgh), President Douglas Wright of the University of Waterloo and the Center of Excellence program (the Canadian government), Tainted Blood and Hemasol Inc. I wrote the federal government upon discovering academic wrong doing at the University of Waterloo warning of the danger of profit over public safety from this program (Douglas Wright’s mantra reported in the papers was “millionaires wandering the halls of academia”). Unknown to me was the deep support of the federal government for this program and that they were helping to just start up the Hemasol Company from an assemblage of banks and businesses. The rest is history, I was black listed and cancer and AIDS theories were suppressed so Hemasol could create millionaires (the company has been reported to be in receivership as of 2008). The corruption and the danger to the public safety with the resultant harm is a PROVEN DOCUMENTED FACT! I still believe in GOOD science and good scientists helping people. I also believe in good business and good practices, but I also believe that BAD BIOTECH and BAD people, scientist, politician or businessperson must be held accountable for their actions and if their actions result in harm then they must be held CRIMINALLY responsible. The harm from bad biotech, new diseases etc is just so very very real and deadly we can not have fools playing around with things that they don’t really understand and the belief that political connections will protect them. This is wrong and dangerous. What do you believe? This presentation is just a temporary update and when I have the material finished more will be added soon, but remember the black listing makes it hard to exist so patience and understanding are appreciated. Your help would be appreciated if you could tell more people of this website so the corruption can be exposed and treated appropriately. Thank you. Edward A.Greenhalgh 26 May 2008 Please note that if you are concerned about Global Warming one of Douglas Wright’s publicly expressed suggestions for the garbage crisis was incineration; this is what I have had to deal with. Please note regarding Global Warming see the Red Section and the Sars Mass Extinction section from the menu in the Green Section as it is not so much about SARS as the creation of NEW diseases resulting from pollution and in response to climate change. Each section discusses many topics so you should review each on its own merits. October 2007 Revision OCTOBER 2007 NEW EVIDENCE NEW EXPLANATIONSDouglas Wright and Michael Lazaridis of Research in Motion (RIM, the “blackberry”)/the University of Waterloo are playing the SEC like a Mafiosi plays a cheap violin. When the issue of basic research is publicly disclosed Chancellor of the University of Waterloo, Michael Lazaridis, will be exposed as a liar and a cheat; while former President and Chancellor, Douglas Wright to having a history of giving deliberately false signed assurances. ONLY A FEDERAL PUBLIC INQUIRY WITH TESTIMONY GIVEN UNDER OATH CAN PROVIDE THE COMPLETE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THESE SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS! What will be demonstrated is that everything that is wrong with academia and the corruption of research today can be traced back to corrupt administration practices at the Universities of Waterloo and Yale. The acceptance and promotion of lying to achieve funding and status is compromising the very basic integrity of any research findings and the ethics of the presenters and represents a very clear danger to the public safety. This can be no more clearer in the safety of NEW vaccines, and presently with dangerous toys and escaped TB strains from CDC labs and the UK hoof and mouth disease disaster. Why do you trust people who are incompetent and lie? Do you believe al Qeda planned the attacks of 911 from Iraq? Conversely, did the holocaust happen? Yes or no? An academic question but you know the answer, however, criminals who seek to escape justice refuse to answer this question. Did the University of Waterloo deliberately, in premeditation, give false assurances for federal monies for a scholarship to Yale that they would not have otherwise received had they told the honest truth? Is this research that they received money for, and is described in official Health Ministry documents in derogatory terms, excellent? Yes or no? WHY NOT answer the question in public, University of Waterloo, unless, like a Nazi war criminal, your only defense is to deny your past? Your criminal past to escape justice? An academic question for an academic center that committed federal felony fraud. How do academic questions affect your life? What good are signed assurances for pet food? Did your pet die? Children’s toys? Did your child eat lead today? How about vaccines? Could you be crippled or killed by a bad batch no one reports because someone hides a report or is told to coverup? Or Chimeras, (human animal cell clones), do you believe the lab precautions because a CEO signed assurances saying nothing can go wrong, like Mission Accomplished? I need your help to continue the research I started but was black listed from completing so fraud could be covered up. I can’t do it alone without you and your help. If you want to help and make sure government tells the truth and enforces the law please read the new material. Please help expose the danger that could harm you and your family. I can’t do this alone. Thank you, Edward A.Greenhalgh, CLICK TO CONTINUE, THEN SCROLL TO MAIN BODY AT MIDDLE OF PAGE May 2007 Revision 2007 NEW FINDINGSHow Criminal Acts (Felony Fraud) Committed by Officials of the University of Waterloo/RIM [the blackberry] Blocked Cancer and AIDS Research. How YALE Benefited Compromising the Basic Integrity of Scientific Research and the Serious Consequences for People like Michael J. Fox and Claims of Truthful Ethical EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH .The Major Role of Business and Banks to REDIRECT Public Money, Federal Programs and the Law to Suit Personal Private Agendas. The Impact on Society from Cloned Meat and Genetically Modified Foods to the Spread of Mad Cow Disease. Why Bad Scientists, Universities, Politicians and Businesspeople MUST Be Held ACCOUNTABLE to the LAW and Federal Programs and the Public. How TACTICS used by the University of Waterloo/RIM are the SAME Ones Used by a Former Nazi SS Death Squad Member to Escape Justice. And How the Consequences of such Actions to have the ELITE RULE and be ABOVE the LAW/ACCOUNTABILITY make a JOKE out of ANY Claims of bioethics (for stem cell research, and other biotech projects including the world's AIDS efforts, flu pandemic, new vaccines and global warming). If Business Controls Universities and are allowed to LIE and Violate the LAW and Federal Regulations, who do you believe and why are you safe? And if you are shareholder concerned about RIM's accounting practices, the SEC has started a formal inquiry of RIM and you may want to contact the SEC yourself to tell them about the history of one of their (RIM's) Board of Directors, Douglas Wright, who as the former President and CEO of the University of Waterloo, has a documented history of giving Deliberately False Assurances for federal programs, funds and considers himself (The Elite) to be better than everyone else and above the Law and Accountability and to use political connections to manipulate federal officials and the law in order to achieve personal gain not otherwise possible by honest means. Read the following to see what you can do to make things better. Topics: Merck/Pfizer/Bill Gates Microsoft/TD Waterhouse Ameritrade/ Scotiabank/AIDS-Africa pandemic/Breast Cancer/ Vaccines/Bird Flu and Pandemics/Yale's New Cancer Center/Hilary Rodham Clinton and New Ideas for America/Affirmative Action for the Middle Class and Poor vs. the Elite/Monsanto and Genetically Modified Food /Cloned Meat, Safety and the Family Farm vs. Factory Farming Ramifications/The RCMP Commissioner Resigned Amid Misconduct Allegations /Global Warming and Emerging Diseases/ The Globe and Mail Publisher, Geoff Beattie and Relationship to Princess Margaret Cancer Center and University of Waterloo/RIM[the Blackberry]/Political Misconduct by Former Prime Ministers Mulroney, Chretien and Martin ;their connections and control by UW/Influence on the US Congress to Avoid Enforcing the Law and Federal Regulations/Failure of Breast Implant Testing/Why the USDA Doesn't Want to Test All Cows for Mad Cow Disease. Basic Question: Is Lying For Money Fraud? Yes or No? What Cancer is, and Why Bad People have been Fighting me while Innocent People are Allowed to Die. Implications for ALL Research. A Personal Challenge for Bono of U2 and Mrs. Melinda Gates: Save 20 Children in Africa from AIDS: Empty Talk is Cheap! ************************************************May 2007, Dear Reader, the website is being updated and the material to support this introduction is being prepared, but is extensive and must be cross referenced to the previous updates. Personal hardships; such as a severe viral respiratory infection in February, and some nasty person spiking our car tires has added to this delay and the general hardships I had to face. So much is said about donating to cancer research especially using small children with baldheads, and women with breast cancer, and the people say, this MAY, this COULD help find a cure for cancer. Well, Ifs and MAYBEs and COULDs are good enough, then isn't it fair to ask the question that if Douglas Wright Fmr President of U of W (and a board member of RIM) and Dr.J.E.Thompson (former Dean of Science at U of W) blocked my cancer theories, shouldn't they be considered "baby killers" etc. by the same coulda woulda token? Especially since the Cell Death Gene Signal is now considered to be an integral part of modern cancer research? And shouldn't Dr.Tak Mak of the Ontario Cancer Institute be compared to the same type of doctors who opposed Semmelwiess who in the 19th century fought to have doctors sterilize their instruments and wash their hands. This concerns a comment Dr.Mak made on TVO concerning breast cancer and pregnancy: he almost sounded like a religious fundamentalist in his fatalist comments. My theory, VTT will explain some very significant points concerning the very causes of this cancer which, once explained like Cell Death Signal Gene, may make treating the disease in older women easier. These are some of the serious topics to be explained and one of the reasons why the update is taking so long. But in light of the Governments' mishandling of the WMDs (never existed) in the USA, and Canada's blotched cover up of the 1985 Air India disaster, you can see why time is essential to uncover the misconduct of government officials who refuse to enforce the law and federal regulations so cronies can escape justice and accountability.Please review the Gold Section and Red Sections for issues that are important such as the implication of emerging diseases and how the pharmaceutical industry CAN'T protect you: they asked the President for a release from any liability for any flu vaccine they may produce. Please note, the Global Warming will promote the emergence of new deadlier diseases and it is not the production of ONE flu vaccine that will be required, but several and on a timely schedule. They have already admitted they can't do it. Think about it. Go to the Green Section and Read Mass Extinction/SARS; it is not about SARS but how the changing climate, pollution and GMO promote new diseases that you have no protection from. Which is why I so desperately need your help. To overcome the malicious blacklisting and financial harm caused by various people associated with the University of Waterloo/Rim and Yale plus the various government agencies acting to protect them. I do need your help to expose and over come this corruption. Please be patient as the changes to this section will be made and are coming as soon as possible. Thank you. Edward A. Greenhalgh, 07 May 2007 May 2006 Revision Title Stem cells were supposed to be a miracle, but all that has been proven is that the South Korean researcher lied and the majority of western institutions/researchers were of such low standards they were unable to detect the flaws and lies. Worst, they seemed more than willing to accept and promote the lie if they (too) could (share in the pie) receive billions of tax dollars for themselves to fund useless research. Useless research solves nothing and people die or are crippled with false hopes. Mrs. Nancy Reagan, they would misuse your dreams and good will in order to lie to use you for money and give back nothing in return (they would steal). That is the definition of bad scientists and universities: people who give deliberate false assurances to gain money for nothing except personal gain and why institutions which give FALSE SIGNED ASSURANCES for taxpayers'/federal monies must be held ACCOUNTABLE! This is especially RELEVANT in light of proposed FLU vaccines – you could die if a bad one is produced and no one is held ACCOUNTABLE and LIABLE. We are talking about the public TRUST and SAFETY. Institutions and researchers must be held to high standards and accountability. Everyone is talking about a (bird) flu pandemic, but what if that is NOT the real danger? Could YOU be (genetically) TAGGED FOR DEATH? Scroll down to the Gold Zone main body text for the full explanation from research suppressed in the early nineties: research blacklisted to cover up academic federal fraud by Waterloo and Yale universities. Research suppressed in flagrant violations of federal mandates (the law). However, (before continuing) please note that the drug companies have told Pres. Bush that they CAN'T (won't) precede with the development of new flu vaccines unless they are free from ANY liability. Please note in the previous 2005 Red Zone Revision I wrote Pfizer concerning the bird flu and vaccines, and informed the then CEO McKinnell that I may love his children more than he does because I have sacrificed so much to develop this research. I have also contacted many many members of the federal governments warning them of the potential harm/deaths to their loved ones. My point is; the drug companies should have responded, ”Yes Sir, Mr. President, we will get on that right away because we have families too, and don't want them to die. Liability concerns? No, Sir, Mr. President, because our families would have to suffer too. We will produce a vaccine that is safe and effective for all. We will personally guarantee this!” Unfortunately, they didn't say that, but instead whined about liability and other excuses that only proved that they (and their Center of Excellence program) are not up to the challenges facing society. They prove my point that they are only concerned about money /profit and not new research that will save lives. If they aren't even concerned about their own families, just where do you and your own family fit into the big picture (think about it)? So when I say that political pressure has been brought to bear, which can threaten the profits of companies, causing the blacklisting of my person and research so academic fraud could be covered up and federal agencies (including the police) have performed improper investigations (misdirection) to cover up the wrong doing, you can see that money and influence form the basis for this statement being proven true. Remember, Rumsfeld lied about Iraqi/ Al Qaeda ties, and the Gomery inquiry (Canada) has proven federal misuse of tax dollars; it is proven that federal people do lie to achieve private agendas, so my claims have a solid basis. So, if you don't want to be TAGGED for DEATH, read the new section and you can help by asking others to read this too (email people /blog it) because the public's help is needed to expose the corruption to help the research go forward and undo the black listing. Scroll down to the main body of text in the Gold Zone.  Home Contact Information Stem Cell Research Emails to Congress 2003 DOJ/RCMP Letters 2003 Email to Paul Martin MAD COW & Social Justice 2003 Emails to PM Martin and BONO. Mission Statement Summary Good Gene Gone Bad Mass Extinction / SARS Letter of Appeal to the Public E-mail to Attorney General E-mail to Secy. of Health Letter to CEO Peter Godsoe - Bad Biotechnology My Resume The Fraud and Plagiarism My Research V.T.T. - Origin of Life Schedule Old Research Proposals Footnotes/Solutions RCMP (CANADA) First Request Second Request Third Request Fourth Request Letter to Sgt. Croal Dept. of Justice (USA) E-mail to John Ashcroft Formal Letter Ken Johnson Letter Fed Ex Letter HSC Letter Chris Besant Letter Hep C Society Letter Coombe Hill 1996 Letter Andrew Telegdi Letters U.S. Dept. of Justice False Claims Act Letter to PM of Canada Univ. of Texas Letter OHRC Cover Letter Fear of Cover-up Bioethics Letter HCCI Allegations 1 Allegations 2 Supreme Court of Canada Donna Shalala Correspondence Spearing-Dockery Correspondence Cal Sneed Correspondence Dep. Chieft Farrington Letter #1 Call for Evidence Ministry of Health (CDN) Request for Information Letter to Allan Rock Supreme Court of Canada Andrew Telegdi Letters Related Links Biotechnology HQ Resource A to Z Fraud   If the issues on the website cause you concern please share them with your Congressional Representative or Member of Parliament. Please write the appropriate Senate Committe too.  "Thank you for your...letter to Surgeon General Jocelyn Elders... Dr. Elders asked that I respond. We regret the difficulties that you have encountered at the University of Waterloo." --Winston J. Dean, J.D., M.P.H. Senior Advisor Office of the Surgeon General October 17, 1994 "Due to our limited resources, TAF can assist in only a small number of cases each year... Everything you have been through sounds awful." --Alan Shusterman, Esq Associate Director Taxpayers Against Fraud September 17, 1997 President George W. Bush has stated, "Justice may take time, but I'm a patient man." Fact : There are no statutes of limitations for fraud committed against the U.S. Federal Government. Fact : Cancer research theories were blocked so as to allow and cover up scholarship fraud at Yale. Mass Extinction / SARS "may be of phenomonal importance" --Noam Chomsky 2004 "The end does not justify the means." --Paul Martin commenting on corrupt goverment. "The government overlooked signs of danger, should bad science continue to be overlooked?" --911 Commision Sign up for my newsletter as there will be updates to this site! To view the articles you need to download:  Click image to get it! AGUST 2006 SUMMARY The Culture of Entitlement Blocks Cancer Research Why and who would block cancer research? The answer is universities and the federal government. The reason is that they can. Powerful and rich business people make up the board of governors of universities and these same people either are politicians themselves or their friends. In the end it is cronyism over the public good that decides that cancer research would be blocked. The complicated is made to sound simple. The open public discussion that would follow is intended for the public good: something good to come from the exposure of corruption. Who am I? I am a cancer survivor who used my own theories to treat my cancer, the same as Lance Armstrong's, and turning down chemo and radiation, my doctors thought I would die. Eight years later, and 23 plus catscans and x-rays etc. my doctor said I am cured. No brain tumour or lung cancer like Mr. Armstrong, I am quite fine thank you. My former supervisor died of cancer. The official university Secretary who told me he had cancer and didn't care if my research involved cancer theories also died of cancer. And the university which black listed me and suppressed the research has now plagiarized my theories. Indeed the Dean of Science has founded a business in collaboration with an American firm claiming the theory as his original concept. This is explained on the website. But please note, the research was suppressed so a C minus physics student could get a biology PhD and a scholarship to Yale. Even though at the request of the university that if I could get one competent authority to support my theory they would allow my thesis to stand. When I brought them a leading cancer researcher they backed down saying you get your experts and we will get ours. Please note their entire funding and the scholarship fraud depended upon there being no other theory. And like in the Blood Scandal I even provided them with a simple cheap chemical test to check and prove the research. That is what science is supposed to do, provide repeatable tests. They refused. They couldn't deal with the truth. They knew the answer they wanted and the truth would not let them commit fraud. CLICK HERE FOR MORE>> No one could imagine a disaster like the WTC could happen because everyone believed that government had adequate safeguards to protect society; just as no one wants to believe that the same government would block cancer research in order to cover up scholarship fraud. Sept. 11/2001 proved the unimaginable does happen due to what the American Senator Richard Shelby called "bureaucratic bungling." And the public must know that it is true that the governments of Canada and the United States blocked cancer research theories in order to cover up federal fraud; please read the email sent on 05 Sept. 2001 to the U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft for details. The world community, ordinary people and legal experts alike, is asked for help. Please answer the question "IS LYING FOR U.S. FEDERAL MONIES (which would not be granted if the honest truth were told) FRAUD?" Yes, or no? The following Website took at least 180 hours of scanning to prepare and several thousand dollars. The Federal Police of Canada and the U.S. were told that the evidence would be placed on the internet for the world community's consideration because corruption and cover-up are cited. Cover up and political favoritism /corruption is especially noted to Canada with the Federal Minister Boudria etc as a fact of life in Canadian politics. Everyone is asked to appreciate the time and effort taken to present the effort and note how the suppressed research has been repeatedly emphasized to the authorities as being necessary for the public good so no one can say it was done "frivolously" or "vexatiously". These are slanderous terms that bad governments try to use hoping to discredit the victim when they try to cover up wrongdoing. The world community may ask that if you would spend so much effort, why not just do the research you claim is for the public good? Blacklisting does not allow you to do research or even receive employment, and so demonstrates the malicious nature of the people suppressing the research. The Canadian federal government must be scrutinized because at any time the Health Minister could have helped the research, but instead my Charter of Rights and Freedoms have been violated and the Federal Government must be seen as reprehensible. Please review the documentation of fraud, suppression of cancer theory, the blacklisting, and realize it represents only ten percent that is available. The World Community is asked to read the " Addendum " sent to the DOJ/Deputy Chief Farrington and the U.S. Congress Committee on Energy and Commerce, plus the material sent to the CEO of the Bank of Nova Scotia (Scholarship Fraud and Bad Biotechnology) and the e-mail to U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow concerning research and healthcare costs (29 May, 2002). The research will benefit society but the blacklisting and harm can only be undone with help from you, the World Community. Read entire letter. Edward A. Greenhalgh May 29, 2002 NEW SECTION REVISION 2004 The documentation PROVES that research of value to cancer was blocked so criminal, academic fraud could be committed. The evidence also proves that cancer research is blocked for money by business people and politicians in order to continue receiving taxpayers' moneys and gain control of patents. Cancer and AIDS theories (now proven correct) were suppressed to cover up the fraud by both the US and Canadian governments. Personnel under the IGO lied in writing as have Canadian officials. Civil rights violations from the blacklisting resulted in order to delay the cancer theories so established cancer centers could get credit (your donations to speed up research are wasted). Both the Canadian and American governments have violated their own laws ( Congress, War Against Cancer Act, and Acts of Canadian Parliament) in order to suppress the cancer and AIDS theories. Various politicians from both countries are cited for dereliction of duty, and collusion in suppressing the research in order to promote and protect the Centers of Excellence Scheme. If you have IBM or Microsoft stock, you should write complaints to the board that they are associated with a Center that blocked cancer research. The greater danger as seen in Tainted Blood, Mad Cow Disease and Avian Flu , is if government will lie about basic federal standards and laws in order to cover up academic fraud for elite friends, then why won't they lie about dangers from bad biotech (especially if they receive donations from the firms)? Remember how truthful they were about WMDs and 911; and the Sponsorship Scandal! What the documentation proves is that new cancer theories are held back by politicians and their friends for money and malicious reasons: all betraying the public trust. If you want to speed up research , then you must act to help expose the corruption and hold wrongdoers criminally responsible. It is the only way to send a message and ensure that science and the new biotechnology are safe. Edward A. Greenhalgh May 2004 Click here to continue this story... REVISION AUGUST 2005 U.S.CONGRESS BIOSHIELD INITIATIVE(See letter dated 14 June 2001 on the original website sent by courier to the US Congress Commerce andEnergy Committee care of Mr.. Johnson)TOPICS: Cancer/AIDS, Stem Cell Research, Bird Flu and New Diseases plus Genetically Modified Cropseffecting the Environment/Evolution.REPORTED in the Media July 2005: the US Congress has asked the Pharmaceutical Industry to participatein the BioShield Initiative to produce new vaccines against new flues and emerging diseases. ThePharmaceutical Industry DECLINED participation citing a lack of PROFITABILITY and the RISK OFLIABILITY.QUESTION: who will do the NECESSARY research in order to protect the public?FACT: reported in the media July 2005 that Chiron, a major flu vaccine supplier to the US and waspreviously closed down last year due to health/quality concerns, is AGAIN reporting productionproblems. If they can't get their act together in a non-emergency humdrum time how in heaven's namewill respond during a crisis?Point, my research is not just about cancer and AIDS or even bird flu, it is about the emerging newdiseases and the return of old ones we thought defeated. Antibiotics and the "miracle" drugs have beenover used so new strains of resistant diseases have developed. You need dedicated imaginative people tomeet the challenge, not bureaucrats.Point, the Canadian government as of July 2005 cancelled 34 million dollars in grants to labsdeveloping cancer, AIDS and SARS vaccines citing them not to be profitable: Bureaucrats with noforesight of future needs. Note, the US government orders fighter planes to protect their homeland, andfighter planes will NEVER show a profit but they are necessary. The Canadian government bought surplusscrapped and refurbished diesel submarines (and cost a sailor 's life) for billions of dollars, butthese machines will never show a profit nor will they necessarily protect anyone. See what I'm upagainst and I want to help society.Please see the June 2005 letter sent to Pfizer CEO/Chairman Hank McKinnell (at the end of this) whereinI address the above concerns. Mr.McKinnell's/Pfizer's reply will be made available when received. Iwish to point out to the public the lengths I have had to go to try and get the research to benefitsociety. Included are the most RECENT proposals sent to Merck, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,plus emails to the Prime Minister of Canada, Paul Martin. My research concerns/theories have a longhistory so I am not just now jumping on any bandwagon; they date back to the early nineties. Indeed,the Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of Life (VTT) was included in material sent to thepresident of Hoeschst-Celanese circa 1992 (see old research proposal section) and note in a discussionon cancer/AIDS/genetic basis for evolution and new flues there is the mention of a protein relevant tobreast cancer treatment. Two points, 1) researchers are now developing such a protein to combat breastcancer, which interferes with the tumour growth, and 2) Hoechst-Celanese is the parent of Aventis orConnaught labs (U of Toronto) which produces vaccines in Canada some of which are sold to the US.Research to develop new techniques for new types of vaccines could have started as early as 92, and ifyou know anyone who died of breast cancer, well, maybe they shouldn't have. Remember, U of Wblacklisted me to cover up the academic fraud. I sent these proposals out to all the major drugcompanies because I thought this was the only way around the suppression and to speed up the worldwideresearch. Please note, Pfizer is gong to be coming out with such protein based drugs soon too, soperhaps my plan did succeed after all. My ideas did help, but now if you do want to protect your familyI need your help. The life you save may be someone who loves you, and isn't such a life worth saving?What kind of person/cancer researcher blocks research for money? The question at first seems silly, butmany cancer researchers are simply bad people holding a position for money and power (a gatekeeper).Professional athletes have used steroids to advance themselves and get millions of dollars even thoughit may cause health problems and their records are frauds. And they are just people, like cancerresearchers and University CEOs who put themselves first ahead of ethics and others. And in evidence ofthis bad attitude was quite clear in the reply where cronyism takes precedence over scientificadvancement of cancer research by the USA Endocrinlogical Society's response to charges of plagiarismagainst my former supervisor when I found out he repeated my experiments (please note, the Canadiangovernment had already cancelled his grant and described his work in derogatory terms so to get hisgrant back he repeated my work. None of this the Government told me, how strange). They said it wasn'timportant if the work was important to cancer research because someone else would repeat it sooner orlater. Sooner or later, you remember this if you know of anyone with cancer because I want you torealize that the letterhead of this official response was the City of Hope, a cancer research center!!!How awful. And about the politics of cancer, please note the reply I received from the Canadian CancerSociety when I asked them for help to develop the research. They simply refused giving the reason thatI had criminal charges pending against the University of Waterloo so they wouldn't get involved. Excuseme but please realize I came to them with proof of my accomplishments and finally found out theresearch at U of W was classified in derogatory terms. They chose not to help proven work and protectcronies. Please note the Canadian Cancer Society has strong connections to the University of Toronto,which incorporates a large cancer center, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, and circa 1992 I had alreadyexplained to Dr. Ling there the Cell Death Signal Gene Theory to tell tumours to die. All Dr. Lingwanted to do was fight with me and tell me how good U of W was and important my former supervisor was.What was more important; cancer research or protecting a crony? If Dr. Ling wishes to publicly disputeANYTHING he must first, on the public record, answer the questions, 1) is research described inderogatory terms excellent, and 2) is lying for money fraud? Also, has Dr. Ling's work found the curefor cancer? By the way in 2002 researchers at U of T announced finding a gene that tells tumours todie. How many years later? Is this the type of attitude to "make cancer history" or just keep the moneyrolling in?FACT: I am a cancer survivor who had the same cancer as Lance Armstrong in 1997 but turned downchemo/radiation to apply my theories and 22 catscans etc later am cancer free without the secondarycancers Mr. Armstrong suffered. A doctor told me it was unusual for a person of 43 to get that type ofcancer.FACT: my former supervisor at UW died of cancer in 2004; he had conventional treatment, and hisresearch was useless to him. Points 1 and 2 are connected by events related to J. C.M.Riley's researchcirca 1987 wherein they ordered radioactive iodine isotope for use in their experiments. Riley, whosework is officially recognized in derogatory terms, (he really was only a C- BSc. Physics student on hisown merit) contaminated the lab, so if anyone else who had any association with that lab or sharedfacilities has developed cancer then there may be a direct link to the low standards that theUniversity of Waterloo allows to exist. I believe there is now a strong causal link between my owncancer and that which caused my former supervisor's death. See bad science can kill.These facts are mentioned because the bad practices and lost research were brought to the attention ofboth federal governments (US & Canada) and they chose to cover up wrong doing at the expense ofadvancing new ideas and beneficial research. Please note in relevance circa 20th July 2005 the CDC inpress conference in response to vaccines and autism and the removal of a controversial preservativesaid they ensure vaccines are as safe as possible and respond to the known scientific facts they haveavailable to them. I have just proven that both governments are good at ignoring evidence presentedbefore them, and you the public if you want to be safe must hold them accountable. Ask them to lay thefraud charges, as this will send a very powerful message to anyone withholding scientific evidence aswe have seen harm can result.WILL THE POLITICIANS HAVE POLICIES TO PROTECT YOU?Both governments have been proven willing to cover up bad science even if it means research will bedelayed or lost and people are allowed to die. Think about this and the concerns of new diseases whichwill require new vaccines and new ideas; will they be able to respond to save your family?The Gomery (Scandal) Inquiry has uncovered the fact that the Chretien (Canada) government was handingout brown envelopes stuffed with thousands of dollars to cronies in exchange for favours. Chretien'sformer Health Minister, Alan Rock as Justice Minister wasted 2 billion (2000 million) dollars on a gunregistry that is not finished. Rock is now Canada's ambassador to the UN covering such topics as AIDs,emerging diseases and human rights. Please note that 2 billion could have helped PM Martin appease Bonoon Canada's failed 0.7% commitment to the third world. Nonetheless, former, PM Chretien appearedarrogantly before the Gomery Inquiry with commemorative golf balls as his defense (he collects thesebecause he likes to golf and there is a club next to his retirement home which he helped subsidize withtaxpayers' money). I asked PM Chretien (and PM Mulroney see reply elsewhere) for help for the cancerresearch and all the wrongdoing. This is a man whose wife picked out commemorative watches under thesponsorship scandal which he had time to approve, but he made no reply to my cancer concerns eventhough it was a courier letter. However, his deputy PM ,Sheila Copps did reply (see elsewhere), so theonly conclusion we can make is Chretien believes golf is more important than helping people withcancer. If you had a loved one die of cancer have a commemorative golf ball made up with themonogrammed loved one's name, type of cancer and date of death on it and mailed to Mr. Chretien. Sendit care of the present PM, Paul Martin in Ottawa Canada; I am sure he will get the message.US politicians, from Congressman Dingel to Mr. Johnson at Energy and Commerce, are no better:the list is too long to mention them all, but please note for people who claim they want new treatmentsand ideas brought to the US they react very badly. Indeed, from the main menu select "email sent to USCongress on Stem Cell Research for insight (it was resent to given address). Rep. D. Cunningham (RCalif) appeared in the media explaining why he voted for its passage; he had a 6 yr old boy withdiabetes appear before their committee who has since died, and said he didn't want anymore little boysto die due lack of research. Rep. Cunningham and his committee never responded to me, nor asked me totestify. I am not opposed to any research which saves lives (also see 2004 Revised Section on this) butexpect my high ethical standards scare the insincere. Several other congressmen appeared on the mediasupporting Stem Cell Research but said high ethical standards would have to be applied! Please note,Rep. Cunningham is now under ethical investigation, but I believe their Committee could have gained alot had they responded to my email points for the proposed research. You should read them, and thenemail Congress yourself and ask them to respond.POINT: The Korean scientist who lead the team which has recently cloned human cells has said you shouldfund the research, okay, lets test his ethical standards and ask him to answer my major Questions inpublic. Is research, which is described, in derogatory terms excellent? And is lying for funding fraud?If he refuses, then his committment to high scientific ethics are open to question. Fair enough.The point is many are crying that stem cell research will give you many miracles, especially in cancer,but if you look at my email (and all my correspondence to US government) that seems to be the least ofanyone's concern because no one has helped. Please recall I had Cancer and survived, but a brother withprostate cancer died with conventional treatment; and a niece has still survived. And about your poor 6yr old, Rep. Cunningham, I have a 4 yr old great nephew (an identical twin by the way) with a braintumour, so spare me your phony tears, you could have helped. Indeed maybe cancer would be history rightnow if it wasn't for the black listing to cover up the fraud at Yale and UW. As for my family, I cantreat myself with anything, but not family members. It would be irresponsible science without theproven clinical studies to support my claims, so I have been forced to sit back and watch as my brotherdied and the others have suffered due to your lack of diligence. And, similarly, Rep. Arlen Spector whoalso appeared on CNN and said he had cancer which was why he was supporting stem cell research soothers would not have to suffer should have his commitment questioned as I phoned his office and askedhim to review my website. No response from Rep. Spector. Why? Why a billion dollars for Stem Cell? Inan earlier section I propose you fund your ten best researchers; what would that cost at 1 million ayear, 10 million dollars and at the end you could evaluate their results. What is wrong with such atrial?ONLY SPECULATION: certain representatives may be looking at large sums of government monies to go tobuilding (brick and glass) stem cell research centers in their home states and have their names put onthem. This is good for their prosperity and also gathering votes by supporting local businesses. Just aquestion, but if you look at cancer research a lot of the money you donate for research goes intobuilding new buildings and not research, hence enhancing the value of the university they are housedon: prestige, not results.About looking for research, what do I have to do to get attention? See the email to Former Sec. of HHS,Tommy Thompson who also appeared on the media talking about his wife who had breast cancer and now hisdaughter too, and how he said he made this a priority while he was at HHS. Really, he never respondedto my approaches so it is fair to ask how hard did he work, and does he really care for his family orwas he just using them for political leverage? Given how hard I have worked to develop the research andhow much I've been kicked, I do believe it is fair to ask these questions.And what about Canada, and PM Paul Martin, does he REALLY support the fight against cancer/AIDSand stopping new diseases/flues? I have emailed him several times and his Justice Minister; IrwinCotler (see email section material) but received no replies. Point, emails are considered as legal ascourier letters, and when PM Martin was running for re-election he used homophobic emails against hisopponents. Why was he able to get these emails but not respond to mine, especially something as seriousas the flu pandemic and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? You, the public, should ask him.About the police, both the US federal (DOJ as represented by Deputy Chief Farrington) and Canadianfederal (represented by Comm. Zacardelli) police have failed the public in failing to do their duty toenforce the law. See Dep. Chief Farrington's reply (main menu),"What laws have been broken?" And Comm.Zacardelli does not even have the courage to personally reply even though I made the legal question assimple as possible: Did Douglas Wright knowingly lie for J.C.M.Riley? Is lying for money fraud?Before continuing, let me make it very clear that no one is asked to support unsubstantiated claims,everything has been documented. And, no one has been asked to support bad science, and to this end Ihave asked the PM Martin to publicly ask (to prove their own ethical standards):1.the scientists on the Canadian Stem Cell Ethics Committee to answer the QUESTIONS (I.E., IS RESEARCH DESCRIBED IN DEROGATORY TERMS EXCELLENT, YES OR NO? and is LYING FOR MONEY FRAUD? ETC)2.the two leading Canadian microbiologists, Drs. Low and Plummer to publicly answer the QUESTIONS.3.I had asked the US Congress Stem Cell Committee to do the same.SO FAR NO ONE WILL ACT!So what can you, the public, do? The ordinary person can not send money, but you can sendemails and ask your friends to read the website and then email the government requesting that they dealwith these issues because they are important to the public good. Email the President and the PrimeMinister. AND YOU CAN EMAIL New York Attorney General, Elliot Spitzer, who has a reputation for honesty and going after corporatecrime, and ask him to answer publicly the QUESTIONS that no one else has the courage or integrity todo.The issues are vital to you to ensure that government and science are honest because you may have todepend upon new vaccines if a new flu or other disease arises. Look, if a deadly killer develops andthe government acts to save you there may be MANDITORY vaccination of the entire population, and so YOUmust demand what you receive up your arm or rump is safe. What if it is not? What if it is justdistilled water to keep the public from panicking as they die? What IF??? It all comes down to thoseSIGNED ASSURANCES I have been fighting about. Now do you see why it is so important to you? whether itis the new stem cell research or the new vaccines, what you must consider is WHISTLE BLOWER PROTECTIONbecause no one in their right mine will speak up after seeing what I have gone through and the publicDID NOTHING TO HELP! And this is why I have been black listed and so vigorously opposed by bothgovernments, because if you help me you will be setting very important precedents that will protectsociety but make it harder for crony politicians to protect cronies. The precedents are:1. University presidents/CEOs can/will be charged under the criminal code (felony) for the misuse of federal funds.2.Whstle blower protection will make it harder to cover up after science ' i.e., bad vaccines and badmedicines and bad government officials.These are all good things that will be in the public good. This is your chance to help and make society abetter place. I cannot make these changes without your help. Please help. Thank you. Edward A. Greenhalgh 21 July 2005REVISION MENU1.Pfizer Letter, "I may care more for your children than you do!" |
|
