| Related sites for http://www.slate.com/id/2071759/ |
| Clean_Ocean_Action Improving the degraded water quality of the marine waters off the New Jersey/New York coast, by identifying sources of pollution and using research, public education, and citizen action to convince pu | | True_Love_Marriage Offers a complementary personal strengths profile questionnaire for couples to better understand one another and their marriage. | | Black_Sea_Economic_Cooperation_(BSEC)_Business_Council Organization of European and Asian states fostering cooperation in trade and development, environmental policy, finance, communications, energy, and other major economic sectors. | | Beautiful_female_mask Our goal is to provide beautiful, realistic masks to our customers at reasonable prices. | | Harvard_Journal_of_Hispanic_Policy Academic journal that is a forum for scholarship and policy analysis on issues related to the U.S. Latino community's political, social, and economic development. | | Fornaci,_Alberto_-_Webzone Profile, resume, photo gallery, humor, and links. | | Independence_Chapter_ALA Chapter information, calendar, officers, articles, members, membership, links, and vendors. | | Tainted_Tribe Images, poetry, fonts, backgrounds, themes, screen savers, reviews, and links. | | Cibella Roger Cibella's family tree featuring Jewish families from Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire who settled in Baltimore, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Ohio, USA. | | History_of_Phrenology_on_the_Web Phrenology, though now generally discredited, was an important historical precursor of later developments in psychology and neuroscience. Contains essays, related images, a large bibliography, and dig | | The_World Magazine of the Unitarian Universalist Association. Site includes recent stories, RSS feeds, and subscription information. | | War\'s_Insidious_Litter__Cluster_Bombs Describes the threat that NATO and Serbian cluster bombs still pose to the population of Kosovo. From the Christian Science Monitor. (June 9, 1999) | | Florida_Police_Benevolent_Association This is the state lead office for the PBA, which serves members with legal council, union negotiation, and maintains an up-to-date listing of topics concerning the police community in Florida. | | Herbs4u Selling retail and wholesale dried herbs, nutritional supplements, as well as pagan and new age supplies. | | A_Suitable_Image Framingham, Massachusetts. Nonprofit providing career clothing and workshops at no charge to low-income women transitioning back to work in the Boston-Metrowest area. | | Vietnam_War_-_America\'s_Longest_War Vietnam War History, major battles and statistics, Collectables and Vietnam War Picture galleries. | | Impartial_Progress Argues that the way to overcome our human limitations is not to improve technology, but to pursue progress as the only goal, which entails abandoning many of our cherished ideals and values. | | Witches_are_Real_People_Too A Christian pastor takes a look at American Neo-Paganism. Not antagonistic. | | International_Spiritualist_Federation Promotes the philosophy and religion of Spiritualism through events, education and communication, worldwide. | | Reverend_Billy Advocacy group led by comic preacher. Opposes chain stores and malls that hurt neighborhoods. |
|
Stop worrying about grade inflation. - By Jordan Ellenberg - Slate Magazinevar PStax = 58325;var msn_cobrand = 0;
var commercialNode = "health/math"; placeAd2(commercialNode,'leaderboard',false,'')Home do the math Campaign 2008 News & Politics Arts & Life Business & Tech Health & Science Style & Shopping Travel & Food Sports Slate on NPR Video flyoutSwitch() Welcome To Our Redesign! Give Yourself Some (Tax) Credit For Your Retirement Plan Eco-preneur Scott Cooney on BizBooks A Fair Share of Federal Contracts Schumer Sez: Loan To Small Businesses! Â Â 
flyoutArray[32]=document.getElementById('bizboxflyoutcontainer').innerHTML;
placeAd2(commercialNode,'120x90',false,'')placeAd2(commercialNode,'120x240top',false,'')placeAd2(commercialNode,'120x240bottom',false,'')Moredo the mathcolumnsWe're Down $700 Billion. Let's Go Double or Nothing!How the financial markets fell for a 400-year-old sucker bet.Jordan Ellenbergposted Oct. 2, 2008Mean GirlsThe New York Times slips up on sexual math.Jordan Ellenbergposted Aug. 13, 2007Will the Democrats Flip the House?Slate's mathematician on the odds of a Democratic victory.Jordan Ellenbergposted Sept. 19, 2006Who Cares About Poincaré?Million-dollar math problem solved. So what?Jordan Ellenbergposted Aug. 18, 2006Proportionate ResponseDoes one Israeli really equal 47 Americans?Jordan Ellenbergposted July 24, 2006Search for more do the math articlesSubscribe to the do the math RSS feedView our complete do the math archivefeatured advertiser linksBook Marriott's breakfast deal now with Visa >> T-Shirts, Custom Jerseys, Barack Obama T-Shirts>> Be Prepared. Fight Identity Theft! Equifax.com >> Introducing The All-New 2009 Acura TL >>placeAd2(commercialNode,'88x31',false,'') do the math: A mathematician's guide to the news.Don't Worry About Grade InflationWhy it doesn't matter that professors give out so many A's.By Jordan EllenbergPosted Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2002, at 10:38 AM ET
Last spring, George W. Bush reassured new Yale graduates, "And to you C students, you too can be president of the United States." He's out of touch. The gentleman's C, in Bush's day a respectably mediocre grade, is now a poor one. One study suggests that the average GPA in research universities and selective liberal arts colleges rose around half a point between the mid-'80s and mid-'90s. That grade inflation is taking place is hard to dispute. The question is: Should anyone care?The arguments put forward against grade inflation span all genres: psychological (easier grading saps a student's will to achieve), moral (a weak performance is unworthy of the letter B), Marxist (grade inflation is a symptom of the consumerization of education), and even geopolitical (higher grades in the humanities draw American students away from the sciences, thereby compromising our ability to build better weapons and deflect other people's).placeAd2(commercialNode,'midarticleflex',false,'')One of the most powerful and popular arguments against grade inflation is that it makes it difficult to tell one student from another. Harvey Mansfield, a professor of government at Harvard and a vocal grade-inflation foe, puts it this way: "Grade inflation compresses all grades at the top, making it difficult to discriminate the best from the very good, the very good from the good, the good from the mediocre."That sounds reasonable. But it's wrong.Start with a thought experiment. Suppose colleges offered only one grade, which we'll charitably call "A." Then all students would get straight A's. Indeed, the best and the very good, not to mention the so-so, are all in one box. Mansfield, so far, is vindicated.Now suppose there are only two grades, which we'll call "A" and "A-," and suppose that, in each course, half the students get A's and half get A-s. Once again, the best, the very good, and the good, all look the same. The mediocre, perhaps, are weeded out. Mansfield is right, to a point; it's hard for him, in his class, with his grade, to distinguish one student to another. But college students take lots of classes. What happens on average over the four years of a college career?Let's take a closer look at this two-grade experiment. Let Eva be a student who, on average, lands in the 70th percentile of her class. That is, 70 percent of students have weaker "natural ability" than Eva does. Of course, Eva will be better at some subjects and worse at others; there'll be some variation in her grades. We quantify this variability by supposing that the standard deviation of her percentile rank is 20. This means, extremely loosely, that the difference between Eva's actual percentile in any given class and 70, her "natural percentile," is "typically" about 20. For her to end up at the 30th percentile, two standard deviations below her average of 70, is an extremely unlikely event—according to the usual bell curve, Eva should score this low less than 3 percent of the time.Now suppose Hans is in the 80th percentile of his class, also with a standard deviation of 20.Both students are above average, and both will get mostly A's. But Hans, in order to dip below the 50th percentile and into the A- range, has to perform 1.5 standard deviations below his mean; this ought to happen about 8 percent of the time, or just two or three times in a standard, 32-class undergraduate career. Eva, on the other hand, gets an A- whenever she performs 1 standard deviation below average; this ought to happen about 17 percent of the time, which means Eva will rack up about 5 A-s. A seat-of-the-pants computation suggests that Eva has just an 18 percent chance of ending up with a higher GPA than Hans. Pretty good, for a system with only two grades!Of course, this two-grade system is still helpless to distinguish between students Zoe and William at the 90th and 95th percentiles. Both have a solid chance of getting straight A's. But now suppose there are five grades, A through B- (A, A-, B+, B, B-), each attained by 20 percent of students. In this inflated regime, even gentlemen can coast to a B+ average! Let's say Zoe and William have average ranks of 90 and 95, again with a standard deviation of 20. Then one works out that Zoe should obtain, on average, 18 A's, 11 A-s, and three B+s, while William comes in with 20, 10, and two. Zoe gets a 3.83 GPA, and William a 3.86. Not much of a difference—but it's there—and admissions decisions have been made on much less. It's worth pointing out that, for our present purposes, it makes no difference whether the grades are labeled A, A-, B+, B, B- or A, B, C, D, F. Their discriminatory power is the same.At this point, readers possessing technical proficiency and a mistrustful temperament will be piping up: Where do all these assumptions come from? How do you know what the standard deviations are? (I made them up.) Shouldn't the deviations be smaller at the top of the grade range? (I don't care.) And what probability distribution, exactly, are you using? (A truncated normal distribution, you fussy creature.) Trust me: None of these questions matter. However you compute, the point stands. A grading scale much too coarse to separate students' performances in a single class (for instance, the system with just two grades) can—if it is not too coarse—be perfectly adequate when we have a whole transcript to look at. How coarse is too coarse? It's actually easy to tell. In the example above, Zoe and William weren't separated on the two-grade scale, because both got straight A's. And, in general, a grading scale is too coarse if there are a lot of students who get the same grade in almost every class they take. In my experience, very few undergraduates make straight A's all through college, let alone straight B+s. That indicates that the present system, inflated as it is, is good enough to rank our students.Indeed, a 2000 Department of Education study found that just 14.5 percent of undergraduates nationwide had a GPA above 3.75. And Henry Rosovsky and Matthew Hartley, in their well-reasoned monograph, found "no large body of writings in which, for example, employers or graduate schools complain about lack of information because of inflated grades." (Certain of their informants did complain to this effect in "informal conversations.") Anyone who's read fellowship applications, or graduate school admission folders, knows that the best undergraduates aren't hard to pick out—they're the ones who excel in nearly every course, the ones with a healthy sprinkling of A+s, the ones whose recommendation letters read like mash notes. So, Mansfield is wrong—which doesn't mean grade inflation is all right. There are still those moral, psychological, Marxist, and geopolitical questions to think of.And underlying all these questions is a deeper one: Why do we grade? Is the point to give students information? To reward, punish, or encourage them? Or just to hand them over to law-school admissions committees in accurate rank order? Until we answer this question, there's little hope of making sense of grade inflation. It's as if we were bankers trying to formulate a monetary policy, but we hadn't quite decided whether dollar bills were a means of economic transaction or a collection of ritual fetish objects."In a healthy university," Mansfield says, "it would not be necessary to say what is wrong with grade inflation." There, again, he's mistaken. In a healthy university, we would talk about every aspect of grading, down to the bottommost questions about why we grade at all. I suspect we'd all find it much less tempting, under those circumstances, to project onto our students' GPAs our anxieties about moral leadership, honesty, and the rewards to be expected from hard work. That would be an improvement. Grades are—should be—many things. But ritual fetish objects they are not.back to topplaceAd2(commercialNode,'rightflex',false,'')also in slate SportsNo Fan Has Suffered as Much as a Rays Fan News & PoliticsWhat Is ACORN, and Why Do Republicans Hate It So? Arts & LifeEight New Shows You Won't Be Watching This Fall Arts & LifeCan Leonardo DiCaprio Make the Iraq War Interesting? Today's HeadlinesHistorical Archives: To Be Sold - Carved Wooden HeadsSat, 11 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0400» More from the OnionWashington Post #washpost_wrapper a { color: #0c4790; text-decoration:none; } #washpost_wrapper a:hover { color:#C00; text-decoration:underline; } #washpost_wrapper img { border:none; float:right; margin:0 0 5px 5px; } #wapo_feed { width:279px; padding:1px; border:1px solid #CCC; } #washpost_wrapper { padding:10px; margin-top:10px; font:normal .700em/1.4em Arial; } #washpost_tout_head { color:#0d3159; font:bold 1.1em Arial; width:56px; border-bottom:1px solid #b1c3d4; margin-bottom:3px;} a#washpost_main_head { font:bold 1.3em Arial; margin-bottom:3px; } #washpost_flash { clear:both; padding-top:10px; margin-bottom:10px; font-weight:bold; } #washpost_flash ul { margin:0; padding:0 8px; list-style-type:square; } #washpost_plus { margin-bottom:10px; font-weight:bold; } OPINIONS Over the LineHarold Ford Jr. | I know what it's like to be smeared by your opponent.: The Positive in Negative AdsRobinson: A Little Worried About the MeltdownKhaled Hosseini: Sen. McCain, Am I a Pariah?Ombudsman: A Puff Piece About the Obamas?King: The Anatomy of an AssaultPLUS » Milbank: The President's Lullaby Today's HeadlinesCan Pakistan Stay Afloat?Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:20:52 GMTFlorida: Will Palin Cost the GOP Jewish Voters?Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:07:56 GMTReview: le Carre Novel Is Missing the Old SparkleFri, 10 Oct 2008 20:41:29 GMT» More from Newsweek Today's HeadlinesAn Obama-Palin TicketThu, 9 October 2008 18:16:56 GMTLove the Player, Hate the GMThu, 9 October 2008 21:10:07 GMTSchooling McCain on the Man CodeThu, 9 October 2008 20:03:04 GMT» More from The Rootrs = PStax; DM_addToLoc("thisNode", rs); DM_tag(); |
|