:: Libertythink :: Encouraging Cognitive Liberty in an Age of Statist Propaganda ::
a:visited {color: #000000;
TEXT-DECORATION: none; font-weight: bold}
a:active {color: #990000;
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; filter: blur; font-weight: bold}
a:link {color: #000000;
TEXT-DECORATION: none; filter: blur; font-weight: bold}
A:hover
{ cursor: pointer; text-decoration: underline; filter: blur;}
em {color: #000000;
font-style: normal;
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 13px}
em.lg {font-size: 13px}
i {font-style: italic}
i.right {text-align: right}
sup {color: #000000;
font-size: 80%;
vertical-align: top}
small {font-size: 80%}
sup.small {font-size: 60%}
h1 {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 18px;
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
text-align: left;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
color: #000000}
h1.right {text-align: right}
h2 {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 16px;
font-weight: normal;
font-style:normal;
text-align: left;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
color: #000000}
h2.right {text-align: right}
h3 {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
text-align: left;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
color: #000000}
h3.right {text-align: right}
h4 {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 15px;
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
text-align: left}
h5 {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 11px;
font-weight: bold;
font-style: normal;
text-align: left;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
color: #000000}
h6 {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 10px;
font-weight: bold;
font-style: normal;
text-align: center;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px}
p {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 12px;
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
text-align: justify;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
color: #000000}
p.pullquote {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: bold;
font-style: normal;
text-align: left;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
color: #000000}
p.left {text-align: left}
p.right {text-align: right}
p.center {text-align: center}
p.sm_rt {font-size: 9.5px;
text-align: right}
p.footnote {font-size: 9.5px;
margin-left: 20px;
margin-right: 50px;
text-align: left}
p.note {font-size: 9.5px;
margin-right: 50px;
text-align: left}
ol {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 16px;
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
list-style-type: decimal;
text-align: left;
margin-right: 20px;
color: #000000}
ol.footnote {font-size: 13px;
margin-right: 20px}
ul {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 16px;
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
color: #000000}
capxion {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 9px;
font-weight: bold;
font-style: normal;
text-align: left;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
color: #000000}
address {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-size: 9px;
font-weight: bold;
font-style: normal;
text-align: left;
margin-left: 0px;
color: #000000}
code {font-family: monospace;
font-size: 9px;
font-weight: bold;
font-style: normal;
margin-left: -1px;
color: #000000}
kbd {font-family: monospace;
font-size: 9px;
font-weight: bold;
font-style: normal;
text-align: left;
margin-left: -1px;
color: #000000}
th {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 14px;
font-style: bold;
color: #000000}
td {font-family: Times New Roman, Times, serif;
font-weight: normal;
font-size: 14px;
font-style: bold;
color: #000000}
body{
scrollbar-base-color: #FFFFFF;
scrollbar-face-color: #FFFFFF;
scrollbar-shadow-color: #FFFFFF;
scrollbar-highlight-color: #FFFFFF;
scrollbar-3dlight-color: #FFFFFF;
scrollbar-darkshadow-color: #FFFFFF;
scrollbar-track-color: #E7E7E7;
scrollbar-arrow-color: #000000;
background-color: White;
}
"Encouraging Cognitive Liberty in an Age of Statist Propaganda"
[SYNDICATE US  ]
Related Sites
Blog this!
 My blog is worth $48,550.44.How much is your blog worth?
Web
Libertythink
:: SUPPORT US
If you like what you are getting on our site, if you want more of it, and if you believe that we are providing a vital service, please give us a hand and contribute to the site. A donation of just $10 or $25 will prove immensely helpful towards enabling us to move ahead.
Make a donation:
$
DONATE
^^PAID ADVERTI$ING^^
Advertise NOW!
[ STAFF ]
:: FAHEY (owner/publisher)
[LIBERTYTHINK GREATEST HITS]
::PKD SUBDRML PRISON
:: S. KOREA TREASON
 VICTORY ACT
:: KAL 007
:: DICTATOR AHNOLD
 GRASSY KNOLL
:: 9-11 MADE SIMPLE
DU HIT PENTAGON
:: KERRY'S MENA BONES
:: BONES & ASHE
:: TRACOR & TAIWAN
:: YOUNG KERRY- CIA?
BOHEMIAN CLUB
:: REAGAN v. BUSH/NWO
:: TBF ASIA INTRIGUE
:: ROVE v. MOORE
[ THE LINKS ]
- GOOGLE WIRE -
:: 9/11
:: [Lthink 9.11 archives]
:: AFGHANISTAN
:: CIA
:: DARPA
:: IRAQ
:: MI6
:: MOSSAD
:: PATRIOT ACT
:: RFID
:: VICTORY ACT
- HOURLY -
- DAILY -
:: ALLSouthWestNEWS
:: ANTIWAR.COM
:: APFN
:: ( BLOGDEX )
:: CRYPTOME
:: DRT
:: GuluBreakForNews
:: I C H
:: INFOWARS
:: J. Orlin Grabbe
:: Mack White
:: ParaPolitics
:: PRISON PLANET
:: PROPAGANDA MATRIX
:: RENSE
:: UNKNOWN NEWS
:: VOX
:: WhatReallyHappened
- WEEKLY -
:: AMERICAN FREE PRESS
:: BARTCOP
:: Breaking All The Rules
:: BATR News
:: CLOAK & DAGGER
:: FRIENDS OF LIBERTY
:: GNN
:: HACKTIVISMO
:: THE MEMORY HOLE
:: PoliceState21
:: POLITECH
:: RumorMillNews
:: THOUGHTCRIMENEWS
:: UNDERREPORTED
:: XYMPHORA
:: WIRED NEWS
- MONTHLY -
:: MMMN
:: SKOLNICK
:: DISINFOPEDIA
:: 911 EXPOSED
:: d|i|s|i|n|f|o
PLEASE CONSIDER SUPPORTING THIS SITE. YOUR ANONYMOUS DONATIONS
KEEP LIBERTYTHINK ALIVE.
PayPal contributions to:
kelly@ctraces.com
[ 
SELECTED VIDEO ]
:: 9-11: ROAD / TYRANNY
|| [ LARGE / SMALL]
:: S-11 REDUX
:: GRASSY KNOLL
:: BOHEMIAN CLUB
[ 
SELECTED AUDIO ]
:: HUXLEY/TERRORISM
:: JEKYLL ISLAND
[ BLOGS & STUFF ]
:: TOTAL411.INFO
:: POST-ATOMIC
:: BATR BLOG
:: BRAIN WAVES
:: TOTEOTA
:: DEFENSE TECH
:: POPDEX
:: CDC
:: SLA
:: IBIDEM
:: CODSHIT
:: TECHNOCCULT
:: FREE SPEECH NEWS
::NEW WORLD DISORDER
:: PULP NON FICTION
:: WARBLOGGER WATCH
:: DR. MENLO
Comments by backBlog
Contact Us
[ LTHINK ARCHIVES ]
Friends of Liberty
:: Contact Us :: Archives :: Links :: 9.11 ::
|
Robert Anton Wilson, R.I.P.
Tuesday, January 16, 2007
Robert Anton Wilson left his body at 4:50am PST, January 11, 2007  by "plummz"January 11, 2007 Discovering Wilson's Illuminatus! trilogy a decade ago was one of this editor's greatest exercises in mind expansion. RAW once posited that the nature of the Illuminati is such that, as soon as you learned of its existence, mere knowledge of such a profound and illuminating secret automatically separated you from the unwashed masses of humanity and made you a de facto Illuminatus. Fortunately, the Internet has given all of us "rogue Illuminati" the chance to take down the Illuminati establishment which has used its monopoly on occult ("hidden") knowledge to mold history toward its own ends; a chance to build a better world. Will we rise to the challenge? More insight from Brian Doherty: "Wilson made libertarian anarchism--both political and epistemological, even ontological--seem open-hearted, fascinating, with a mysterious and energetic history, something that could win hearts and minds against any number of competing means of modeling human social reality.....[he] was a grand recruiter for libertarianism, both through Illuminatus! and his series of optimistic, futuristic, epistemologically anarchistic essays and nonfiction works that stress the glories of no human limits, physical, spiritual, or political. This is true despite his separation from most aspects of the standard movement, and despite the fact that his work appeals on so many levels that one can become a Wilson Head without reaching his libertarianism. Through Wilson's influence one might become an Aleister Crowleyan, a Wilhelm Reichian, an old-fashioned Tuckerite, a techno-future-optimist in the manner of Buckminster Fuller or Timothy Leary.[...]But he also said, as quoted in my book, when asked to expound on the differences between him and the then-dominant Misesian-Rothbardian strain of the movement in a 1976 interview, "this is turning into a diatribe against the group I find least obnoxious on the whole politico-economic spectrum...The orthodox conservatives and liberals, not to mention Nazis and Marxists, are really pernicious, and the Austrian libertarians are basically OK." [...]He was my gateway to Welles and Chandler, to Leary and Fuller, to Pound and Reich, to conspiracy theory and libertarianism, and to all the ideas and experiences, intellectual, aesthetic, and actual, that rolled from those varied and fascinating entryways into art, ideas, and living. I hope I can do good by the principles he helped imbue in me. He excelled as both novelist and essayist; he was a noble steward of the ideas he espoused, a brilliant and passionate popularizer, and the characters and scenarios and approaches to fiction of his novels reward constant reading with constant pleasure and insight--he was a pop-Pynchon of sorts in his sprawling, comic-serious approach to Big Crazy Ideas, who got a thousandth of the respect and delivered a thousand times the joy and humanity. -----. . . and Jesse Walker: "One of the things I like best about Wilson's writing is his ability to spin stories that managed to be "real" and "a put-on" at the same time. One theme of his later work, for example, was an elaborate parody of those far-right theories that say the U.S. is controlled by a Zionist Occupational Government. Pointing to the Drug Czar, he said we actually live under a Tsarist Occupational Government, and then constructed a historical argument that Tsarist agents of influence had infiltrated and taken over the American government. It was hilariously absurd, yet most of the details were real -- and so was the point he was making about the drug war... He called this "guerilla ontology."
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by ColumnistGuild 16.1.07 |
|
Texas Congressman Ron Paul files for GOP presidential bid
Thursday, January 11, 2007
HOUSTON -- Ron Paul, the iconoclastic nine-term congressman from southeast Texas, took the first step Thursday toward launching a second presidential bid in 2008, this time as a Republican.  Paul filed incorporation papers in Texas on Thursday to create a presidential exploratory committee that allows him and his supporters to collect money on behalf of his bid. This will be Paul's second try for the White House; he was the Libertarian nominee for president in 1988. Kent Snyder, the chairman of Paul's exploratory committee and a former staffer on Paul's Libertarian campaign, said the congressman knows he's a long shot. "There's no question that it's an uphill battle, and that Dr. Paul is an underdog," Snyder said. "But we think it's well worth doing and we'll let the voters decide." Paul, of Lake Jackson, acknowledges that the national GOP has never fully embraced him despite his nine terms in office under its banner. He gets little money from the GOP's large traditional donors, but benefits from individual conservative and Libertarian donors outside Texas. He bills himself as "The Taxpayers' Best Friend," and is routinely ranked either first or second in the House of Representatives by the National Taxpayers Union, a national group advocating low taxes and limited government. He describes himself as a lifelong Libertarian running as a Republican. Paul was not available for comment Thursday, Snyder said. But he said the campaign will test its ability to attract financial and political support before deciding whether to launch a full-fledged campaign. Snyder said Paul is not running just to make a point or to try to ensure that his issues are addressed, but to win. Paul is expected to formally announce his bid in the next week or two, Snyder said. Snyder said Paul and his supporters are not intimidated by the presence of nationally known and better-financed candidates such as Sen. John McCain of Arizona or former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts. "This is going to be a grassroots American campaign," he said. "For us, it's either going to happen at the grassroots level or it's not." Paul limits his view of the role of the federal government to those duties laid out in the U.S. Constitution. As a result, he sometimes casts votes that appear at odds with his constituents and other Republicans. He was the only Republican congressman to vote against Department of Defense appropriations for fiscal year 2007. The vote against the defense appropriations bill, he said, was because of his opposition to the war in Iraq, which he said was "not necessary for our actual security."
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by ColumnistGuild 11.1.07 |
|
John McCain: "I Want to be YOUR Internet Nanny"
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
Watch John McCain take a beating from the Left/Right and techno-hip Center:http://news.com.com/5208-1028_3-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=23408&messageID=218839&start=-1
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by ColumnistGuild 13.12.06 |
|
Tancredo protesters turn violent
By Anne MulkernDenver Post Staff WriterArticle Last Updated: 12/01/2006 12:45:23 PM MSTProtestors at a Michigan law school turned violent Thursday as they attempted to stop a speech by Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Littleton. (Post) Violence erupted at a Michigan law school Thursday when protestors tried to block a speech by Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo. Police were called after protestors pulled a fire alarm prior to the speech on immigration policies. There were at least three violent incidents with protestors targeting student backers of the event, Tancredo, R-Littleton, said today. "One was spit on, one was kicked, and one was punched," Tancredo said in an e-mail. "Tires were also slashed." Michigan State University College Republicans and Young Americans for Freedom sponsored the event. Tancredo went to Michigan State University College of Law as part of a visit to the state to talk about immigration. He leads the group that opposes legal status for illegal immigrants. Protestors interrupted the speech with loud shouting. College newspaper The State News reported that protesters carried signs reading "Ignorant Racist" outside the room where the speech was held. They were not allowed in with the signs, the paper said. It also reported that about 40 people attended the speech. Tancredo said in the email that protestors organized on the Internet social networking site Facebook. "They declared ahead of time on facebook that they would not allow me to speak," Tancredo said in the e-mail. Tancredo also is meeting with the Republican state party chair, members of the state legislature, and is speaking at a fundraiser for a Republican women's group, Tancredo spokesman Carlos Espinosa said.
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by ColumnistGuild 2.12.06 |
|
The White House Bordello: The Gay Whorehouse from Texas
Thursday, November 23, 2006
by Texe MarrsNovember 24, 2006Ted Haggard, pastor of the 140,000-member New Life Church in Colorado Springs and head of the 30-million strong National Association of Evangelicals, after being outed as a crystal meth snorting sodomite guilty of paying male prostitutes for sex and drugs, reluctantly admitted, "I am a deceiver and a liar." Now, isn't it way past time that yet another high profile sodomite, a cocaine abuser shamelessly guilty of hiring male prostitutes to service him, also finally step forward and admit, "I too, am a deceiver and a liar?"I'm referring, of course, to George W. Bush, current occupant of the nation's #1 political job, the presidency. This may be quite a shock to some readers, but most folks in the Washington, D.C. beltway already know what I'm going to reveal here. Yes, they know that George W. is a bisexual and a procurer of male prostitutes.Many insiders snicker and laugh ha, ha, ha, at brain-dead Christian evangelicals who actually believe that George W. is a God-fearing heterosexual, born again Christian. As David Kuo, former top White House adviser in the Bush Administration, reveals in his new book, Tempting Fate, the Bush White House team sneers and jokes about the evangelicals so easily deceived by the President. Kuo presents evidence that the Bush people view Christian evangelical leaders and their flocks as ridiculous, silly, nuts, even insane. To the Bush people, Christianity is a farce and Christians are easily duped idiots.George W. Bush's Tarnished ReputationGeorge W. Bush, as many Texas politicos could easily tell you, had quite a reputation back in the Lone Star State for both his sexual misconduct and for his snorting of loads of white powder (cocaine) up his nose. The man never held a real job; he shirked his Air National Guard duties, having joined the Guard in the first place only to evade serving in Vietnam. Bill Clinton dodged military service, too, by running off and hiding in England, but Bush hid in plain sight, in an Air National Guard uniform. It's great to have friends in high places to help out in time of need, isn't it?Bush and Clinton are alike in one other aspect as well. Both used the White House as a Whore House. Bill did sexual things with cigars with a young intern, while George had his muscular, boy-man homosexual lover, Jeff Gannon, stay over many a night in the White House. He and young Jeff Gannon weren't discussing foreign policy and affairs of state all those times in the wee hours of the morning in the presidential bedrooms, I assure you.Fabulous, Gorgeous, QueerSince assuming the presidency, George W. has surrounded himself with gay men. The White House is jokingly referred to as the "Pink House" by the Gay Community. First, there's Karl Rove, Bush's campaign chief. Rove's father was gay, and Rove himself is a queer. According to Fox-TV News, Karl Rove smiled knowingly when a Fox-TV reporter asked him about the special nickname his pal, the President, lovingly has for him.President Bush calls me "Turdblossom," Rove said. Why "Turdblossom?"?Please, let's not go there.George W. Bush often commends male visitors to the White House for their "fabulous" clothing. He told the Canadian Prime Minister that his young, male press advisor was "gorgeous." Bush appointed Ken Mehlman, a Jewish homosexual, as the Chairman of the Republican National Committee. Think of it?a homo as titular head of the entire Republican Party!Bush also named his gay roommate at Yale University, Tennessee's Victor Ashe, Ambassador to Poland. As Global AIDS Coordinator, another Ambassador-rank position, Bush chose homosexual activist Mark R. Dybul. Secretary of State Condi Rice administered the oath of office to the new appointee, recognizing Dybul's gay lover and live-in partner, Jason. Condi, a reputed lesbian dominatrix, even permitted the Ambassador's homo partner, Jason, to hold the Bible upon which Dybul laid his hand while taking the oath of office. President Bush has more homosexuals in his Administration than Bill Clinton, and he's more than accommodated their "special needs." For example, Bush appointed a queer to be the new Ambassador to Romania, then approved the man's sodomite lover to fly off with him in a U.S. aircraft to Bucharest, the capital of that nation, where the gay Ambassador and his lover now contently shack-up together in an embassy-leased mansion, at U.S. taxpayers' expense. The two sodomites even attend official functions together. I wonder what the leaders and citizens of Romania think about that? Homosexuals Love Bush's Supreme Court NomineesBush's biggest coup was his choice to be the new Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. John Roberts, a gay judge, is not only queer himself, but he's the infamous attorney who represented the entire homosexual community of America in the notorious, landmark court case, Romer v Evans (1996), in which all state laws forbidding acts of sodomy were declared unconstitutional.The depraved Judge Roberts is so fanatical in his support of sodomy and gay rights he even fought the case for his limp-wristed buddies on a pro bono basis?he didn't even charge the queer groups a dime for his services. Now that's real devotion to a cause, however corrupt.So, thanks to our "born again Christian President," George W. Bush, we have sitting at the helm of the U.S. Supreme Court one of the most highly acclaimed gay rights attorneys in the world. Whoop-te-do!What's more, so enamored of Bush and slavish to his every need are evangelical leaders like Pastor Ted Haggard, James Dobson, Pat Robertson, and Jerry Falwell that they ended up enthusiastically throwing their full support for John Roberts' confirmation by the Senate. So, gays owe a great debt of gratitude to the Dobson-Falwell crowd, as well as to George W. Bush, for this generous favor.When just a few, old-line conservatives complained about Judge Roberts' devoted, pro bono work on behalf of the gay rights movement, Jerry Falwell, always a boot kisser to Republican presidents, jumped in to defend Bush's pro-gay choice. Gay rights, said Falwell, "is not a liberal or conservative value. It's an American value that I would think that we pretty much all agree on." Uh, hold on there, Jerry. Not "all" of us agree on that. In fact, I suspect there are at least several thousand readers of Power of Prophecy newsletter who believe sodomy and its cousin, pedophilia, are both a sin and a crime.Steamy Lesbian Sex and the Infamous Bear NovelAnd there's more. George W. Bush was the first President to have formal public meetings in the Oval Office with the Log Cabin Republicans group?a merry band of GOP queers into politics. He chose for his running mate Vice President Dick Cheney, whose wife, Lynn, authored several novels with what have been called "steamy lesbian sex scenes." Fitting since, as it turns out in real life, the Cheneys' daughter is a full-scale lesbian political activist.Cheney for four years was served by his Chief of Staff, an odd fella named Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Libby, who has been indicted by a federal grand jury for intelligence crimes, is reputed to be an Israeli secret agent. Libby, or "Scooter" as Cheney and neocon friends so lovingly call him, also is a novelist. In one of his fiction books, he has an account of a caged bear being sexually tormented by human sex fiends with sticks. (Incredible? Yes, but also sickeningly true).Israel's President Rapes Ten AidesBush and Cheney are, as we all know, huge backers of Israel and are extremely supportive of Israeli politicians. Is it not significant, then, that Israel's President, Moshe Katsov, is now under investigation in that country for raping and sexually molesting ten young staffers? The crimes of Katsov, the sex-fiend President of Israel, are perhaps exceeded only by those of Bush and his homoerotic cohorts.Consider the sexual sadism practiced at Abu Ghraib prison. Video films of Iraqi male, nude prisoners showed many being victimized in acts of brutal sodomy. Naked Iraqi males?many whom later were found to be innocent?were stacked in pyramids, their sexual organs revealed.Evidence shows that top Bush White House and Pentagon officials, including Secretary of State Rumsfeld, privately viewed these obscene, monstrous movies, no doubt for their own, wicked pleasures. Apparently, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and all the other Bush Administration perverts get a real rise out of viewing young men screaming in agony as they are ritualistically tortured and sexually abused by sodomite creeps. Shades of the abominable activities of France's notorious sadist, the Marquis de Sade.Seymour Hersh, acclaimed New York writer who uncovered the My Lai, Vietnam atrocities decades ago, reports that inside the Pentagon's inner sanctum, kept hidden by Bush people from view by ordinary Americans, are horrific videos that beggar the imagination. They include grim scenes of U.S. CIA and military interrogators raping and sodomizing Iraqi children. Hersh has seen them and says the "soundtrack of the shrieking boys" and hearing their mothers, forced to watch, crying out for mercy, made him sick to his stomach.Bush is a sick, sick man, indeed. Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, and Beria don't have a thing on this man. Bush and his coterie of homoerotic thugs are craftier and more sinister than anything the brutal Soviet system ever produced. And coincidentally, Lenin and the boys in Russia were all Jews, and they were all homosexuals to boot. Just like Bush and his neocons.Crushing the Testicles of Little BoysOnce we peer within, we find worse and worse elitist Bush perversion down deep inside the White House rabbit hole. In a debate in Chicago with Notre Dame professor and scholar Doug Cassel, Bush Justice Department attorney John Yoo argued that President George Bush has the full legal authority to sexually torture anyone suspected of being a terrorist. According to Yoo, if Bush desires, he can even order the sexual torture of infants. He can, for example, order interrogators to crush the testicles of a person's child, to get the parent to "confess." It was Yoo who authored Bush's misnamed Patriot Act legislation, authorizing the torture, the suspension of constitutional rights for suspects, and the imprisoning of "potential" criminals at U.S.-run gulag camps.Extending outside the White House, we find even more evidence of the sicko regime: GOP Congressmen Mark Foley, Danny Hastert, Jim Kolbe, and a slew of others, including Governors, Senators, and Judges. Homoerotic thugs all, and not a few pedophile predators among them. The evil goes back all the way to the Lyndon B. Johnson and the Reagan Administrations. Many of President Ronald "Hollywood" Reagan's White House pals were also sodomites.Jewish Talmud Approves PedophiliaThat most of the Bush queer battalion are Jews is not a surprise. The Jewish Talmud, the rabbis' most holy book, officially endorses pedophile acts by homosexual fiends. The Talmud says that sex with a girl under three years of age, or a minor boy under nine, is permissible. It's not even a "sexual connection," say the rabbis.Evidently, evangelicals like TBN's Paul Crouch (who gave $425,000 to hush-up his homosexual lover from writing a tell-all exposé of he and Paul's sodomite affair) and the NAE's gay deceiver, Ted Haggard, for years either winked at the White House Bordello, or just avoided the issue.So, apparently, did Dobson, Falwell, Hagee, Graham, Warren, Hybels, Schuller and all the other evangelical fakesters. For this crowd, it's the old monkey's routine of "see, hear, say nothing."Laura Bush's Revealing ChoiceFirst Lady Laura Bush has surely known about her hubby, George's, sexual infatuation with male prostitute Jeff Gannon. And she must at least suspect the grotesque goings-on of the strange men who carry on their sick and sordid behavior inside the secure work areas of the White House Bordello. A hint of her sure knowledge came a couple of years ago when officials of the Texas Library Association asked Mrs. Bush to identify a single play or book that the First Lady personally enjoyed and was representative of what Laura considered "the best that Texas authors and playwrights had to offer." Madam Bush's revealing choice: "The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas."Could it be that the best little whorehouse in Texas is actually a bordello, an exclusive yet seedy establishment located not in Texas but in Washington, D.C., a giant, white Greco-Roman mansion sitting behind a handsome wrought iron-fence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue?
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by ColumnistGuild 23.11.06 |
|
The Day After
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
 Gridlock is good.Fuck Dubya. Now he'll have to start using his God-given VETO powers (the pussy).House is taken by the 'rats; Senate looks like it might fall, too. The Pubbies had their chances for limited Gubm't; wasted them since 1994. No pity or sorrow here.
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by ColumnistGuild 8.11.06 |
|
Expose of the "Federal" Reserve System: Ezra Pound, American Hero
Sunday, October 29, 2006
The following link is a video of a conversation with Eustace Mullins currently on line via Google. This tape reveals how we got to the place we are and where we are headed. I urge you to take the time to view it. He addresses how he and Ezra Pound discovered and wrote about the people behind the Federal Reserve banking cartel.http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=8667011121551944391&q=eustace+mullins
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by ColumnistGuild 29.10.06 |
|
US Constitution and the Founding Scoundrels
by "GnoseBob"October 28, 2006 Unfortunately the original Confederate constitution was patterned after the 1787 US Constitution which itself was a repudiation of the whole revolutionary war effort against British dominance. Constitutions are quite unnecessary unless a people surrender all their sovereignty to a government in which case restraints are seemingly necessary to keep that government from ending the people's liberties. The primary mistake with any government is to rely on the democratic process, for by one's vote one surrenders one's sovereignty to those for whom one votes. Any government, and there have been many around the world which have patterned their organizations on the US Constitution, is doomed to failure as far as freedom is concerned. This is from the people's point of view. "All organizations are organized for the benefit of the organizers." From the government point of view government is always a success until it self-destructs from its own internal rot and corruption. Under a government's dominance, there can be no such thing as a "sovereign freeman." There have been thousands of books written extolling the virtues and imaginary benefits of the US Constitution over the past couple hundred years. There are endless articles written today about how all society's problems can be ended by merely abiding by the Constitution's original intentions. BUT, unless one understands the original intentions of the Founding Scoundrels who met in secret conclave in 1787 to conspire against the freedoms of the American people, one KNOWS NOTHING about the Constitution and is unqualified to write one line about the damnable document. I realize that the Constitution is considered as sacred as the Bible by those who know little of the origins of either and I realize that nothing is ever going to be done to correct all the widely agreed-upon stupidities of our age which will in short order bring civilization once again to its knees. But once in a while I turn off the idiot box and dig out a book of substance and feel like climbing back up on the soap box. I just hate to see America go down by default. I just re-read John Lansing's notes on the 1787 convention and it has revived my animosity towards all the political silliness that we hear about us. I'm sure you have heard of the practice of withholding critically damning evidence of a situation until a period of time has elapsed - often fifty years - to protect the living reputations of those involved in a particular undertaking. Did you know that they did this in 1787????? There were 65 men delegated by their states to attend the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. Did you know that ten of these refused to attend, including one whole state, Rhode Island? Did you know that of those who did attend another sixteen were too ashamed of the document to put their names to it? That means that of those who were delegated to attend not even a two-thirds majority could be mustered to ratify the thing, let alone the unanimous agreement required by the Articles of Confederation, the amendment of which was the sole purpose for calling the 1787 convention. Of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, 16 signed the Articles of Confederation; 8 attended the 1787 Con-Con, but only 4 of those signed the Constitution. If it was so great, why didn't those who were a party to its creation jump at the chance to add their names as signers? Of those who actually attended the 1787 Constitutional Convention I'd imagine all kept copious notes of the goings-on. Madison's notes are easily obtainable but reflect his objective of creating an all-powerful central government. He condemned democracy but gave us just that. I do appreciated Madison's vetoing of Hamilton's first US Bank act extension however. In fact it was Madison who wrote Washington's objection to the act in 1791, which act handed over 80% of the new central bank to Crown interests. Some independence, huh? Robert Yates' notes are obtainable from Omni Publications. He was a NY delegate who refused to sign, Chief Justice of his state. Yates' notes were copied for publication by John Lansing, Chancellor of NY, who also refused to sign. The Yates volume also contains Attorney-General Luther Martin's exposition on the Constitution as presented to his state, Maryland. Good stuff in Yates. I would like very much to dig up more of these records as surely more were published. Only then can one be qualified to say anything about the true nature of the document in question. John Lansing's notes, entitled THE DELEGATE FROM NEW YORK might be obtainable from used sources as I know of no current publication. As a proponent of state sovereignty he wrote that Hamilton had urged that "state governments ought to be subverted so far as to leave them only corporate rights." Lansing wrote more of Hamilton: "It will not do to propose formal extinction of State Governments - It would shock public Opinion too much. --Some subordinate Jurisdictions --something like limited Corporations. If general Government properly modified it may extinguish State Governments gradually." Delegate Wilson said "National Government implies the Idea of an Absorption of State Sovereignty." So much for the nonsense that it was Lincoln who ended state sovereignty. It was the Founding Scoundrels themselves. It is interesting that when speaking of the staggered elections of Senators they referred to "retiring" a third of them every election. Apparently the limiting ideas of the Articles were still in mind. On the other hand Franklin moved "that the Executive should receive no Salary Stipend or Emolument for the Devotion of his Time to the public Service but that its Expences (sic)should be paid." This was the same scam that Washington pulled as commander in chief which shocked the Congress so that it took upwards of a year to come up with the cash. His wine bill alone might have gone a long way towards supplying Arnold's fighting troops with shoes. Lansing brings out the fact that most state delegations were only empowered to propose amendments to the existing Articles. There was also supposed to be a calling for state conventions to approve of the new rules, called by the people, but as you study the words of the Founding Scoundrels you see the people have no affective place in the new system. Lansing also remarked on the difference in office holding, whereas in the old Congress, members held office for only one year, and could be recalled at any time; in the new, they would have longer and more secure tenure and would feel safer to take bribes. There was decided class consciousness in all this. The second Branch of the new Congress "ought to represent the Wealth of the Nation - if so they ought to serve without Compensation," said Charles C. Pinckney. Johnson said "must unite Ideas of States with Districts of Country containing a certain Number of Inhabitants." So here the modern idea of districting the US isn't so modern after all. Read said he favored proportional representation only if the new government were "truly national," but that he feared the mixture of state and federal powers. He favored Hamilton's plan. Madison said "it is a contest for power, not for liberty." G. Morris said "2nd Branch must be Men of great Property." A House of Lords would have been met with considerable opposition back then. "Aristocracy should keep down Democracy" he added. Rutledge said "Honesty will probably predominate in lower House Ability in upper." He missed the mark twice with that statement. More from Gouverneur Morris: "If our establishments are good they must be supported and will take a proper Direction - If the State Governments have Distribution of Loaves and Fishes the general Government cannot prevail -- You must give them Disposition of Offices and Baubles -- The Senatorship will operate as a Lure." I wonder how many gullible state legislators who thereby were lured into ratifying the new Constitution weren't salivating over the thought of becoming parties to the new Roman Senate. So here are a few notations that give one an idea of some of the thinking of these characters. I urge anyone who has an interest in the Constitution to collect some of these published minutes and discover the real purposes behind it all. The idea of another Constitution holds no promise of any rebirth of freedom. It only offers a new set of chains to bind down the people. Only by going back to the Saxon (and earlier) basic ten family political unit (the Tun) and working up from there by appointing - NOT ELECTING - representations to sit in council can a limited government ever be constructed. It has to come up from the people, not from a real or imagined aristocracy. This is what a republican FORM of government is all about. The democratic form is suicidal.
| Libertythink Perma-Link | by ColumnistGuild 29.10.06 |
|
CLICK HERE FOR THE
FRONT PAGE
GOOGLE LIBERTYTHINK
"There ought to be limits to freedom." -- G.W. Bush
"The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic
and catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor" (2000)
-- Project for a New American Century
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept
the New World Order."
-- David Rockefeller
"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death."
:: ARCHIVES :: CONTACT ::
|
|
